11

Recently I asked this question on global Meta. The problem is when users upload huge photos to illustrate something they usually don't need very high resolution - for example, it might be a photo of a sink and it doesn't need to be 2000K by 1500K and weigh 700 kilobytes - it can be much smaller and will still look good. Downloading huge pictures is a problem for many users.

Turns out (thanks to user Jeremy Banks for that answer!) imgur.com allows to downscale images automatically by appending letter l between the name and the extension.

So you upload an image and you get a link like http://i.stack.imgur.com/Xulw9.jpg and when you insert l you get http://i.stack.imgur.com/Xulw9l.jpg (notice l before .jpg) and that automatically makes imgur.com serve a smaller version of the image that weighs much less.

I kindly ask all users who add pictures to use this feature unless of course you need that super high resolution to illustrate some super fine details.

5

Good find about the l.

I wonder if something could be done to insert the l automatically?

I've just worked out that l actually stands for "large thumbnail". You can get smaller images by appending m (for "medium") and s (for "small") as well.

  • 2
    Sure. There's a feature request on global meta. It shouldn't be that hard to render appropriate HTML by SO engine - like insert a small version inline and provide a link to a full size version. I guess once it gets enough upvotes the team implements it. – sharptooth Aug 19 '11 at 8:13
  • Btw I made a separate explicit feature request for that - meta.stackexchange.com/q/107927/132564 – sharptooth Sep 30 '11 at 6:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .