The question was voted on by the community to close with the reason "needs details or clarity" and "opinion based". After the question was closed, reviewers looked at the edits and the request to reopen and declined to reopen with the reason "original close reason(s) were not resolved". Looking at the edits, they appear to be superficial, and not providing more details that the community may be looking for.
Reviewing the question myself, a few things stand out:
- Asking how to build your own product to replace the vendor supplied one could be seen as bordering on a hobby project rather than a home improvement question.
- The number of links to vendor websites could be interpreted as spam. We get a lot of content that pretends to be legitimate questions and answers but use that to push links to products they are selling.
- The phrase "Disregard — and I need no assistance with..." may be quickly viewed by a reviewer as you indicating you no longer have the problem if they did not read it in detail.
We do recommend that users voting to close a question provide details on how the question can be improved. And before the question was deleted, asking for that guidance in the comments would have been a good next step. Unfortunately, it's past the 10 day grace period and the community bot has marked the question for deletion.
Please have a look at the tour. If you can ask the question with more details, such as an analysis of the construction of the current filter, it may be appropriate to post a new question.